The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

One conservative legal scholar had this to say to me: "Romney's position is that the line item veto is a good thing so Congress must be able to enact it by statute. This is liberal result orientation. The Constitution does not empower Congress to legislate every good thing under the sun. It is a good but not perfect document. It is a mistake to think that because something is good, Congress must be able to do it or there must be a constitutional right protecting it." Also Kmiec's touting of originalists sans Thomas is not exactly an advertisement for selecting judges without litmus tests or results oriented aims.

topics:
Constitution

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Jennifer Rubin

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/10/12/re-the-line-item-veto-fight

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT