The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Re: On Line-Item Veto

Without defending the constitutionality of the line-item veto statute struck down by the Supreme Court, I'd point out that impoundment wasn't unique to Richard Nixon -- it actually began at least in 1801. Every president from Thomas Jefferson to Nixon was thought to have impoundment power. Nixon went much further in impounding spending than any of his predecessors, however, and had some other, uh, problems going on at the time.

Even then, Congress didn't appeal to the Constitution or run to the courts to stop Nixon's impoundment. Instead, they passed a statute, the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, getting rid of the practice. Under the law, the president retains the power to propose recission of certain items, though that falls short either of the line-item veto or the enhanced recission authority pursued by the Bush administration.

topics:
Constitution, Law, Supreme Court

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/10/10/re-on-line-item-veto
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT