This is precisely the dilemma pro-lifers face in the next
election. They can support a pro-choice candidate and hope that it
will do no practical damage to their movement because he will
mostly side with them on the issues that are in play -- or even
define the pro-life label down to the point where he qualifies.
They can support a candidate with a long, mostly pro-life voting
record who has never seemed comfortable with the issue and
disagrees with pro-lifers on at least one major issue that is in
play. They can support a candidate who agrees with them on every
issue but has only done so since late 2004, early 2005. Or they can
support a candidate with no chance of being nominated or
elected.
That's one of the reasons so many people waited for Fred
Thompson to get in. And, as we've covered on this blog, he has
proved to have his own problems from a pro-life perspective.