Doesn't the ruling and Carpenter's argument bolster the case that Constitutional amendments on this subject (even the variety Thompson most recently suggested) are less urgent and possibly unneccessary at this point? If state supreme courts left to their own devices and reading the political tea leaves in their own states have put the brakes on imposing same sex marriage by judicial fiat do we have solutions in search of a problem?
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.