The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Doesn't the ruling and Carpenter's argument bolster the case that Constitutional amendments on this subject (even the variety Thompson most recently suggested) are less urgent and possibly unneccessary at this point? If state supreme courts left to their own devices and reading the political tea leaves in their own states have put the brakes on imposing same sex marriage by judicial fiat do we have solutions in search of a problem?

topics:
Constitution, Supreme Court

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Jennifer Rubin

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/09/18/re-maryland-court-doesnt-impos
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

ADVERTISEMENT