The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

After spending much of Monday and Tuesday watching the testimony of Gen. Petraeus, I think that several developments make it much more likely that Congress will grant him more time to carry out the surge strategy. They are, as follows:

--The decision by MoveOn.org to take out the "Betray Us" ad was an absolute blunder. A majority of Americans may oppose the war, but they still hold the military in high esteem, and it simply is not helpful for opposition to the war to be associated with smearing a well-respected military leader who-no matter one's views on the war-is doing an admirable job given the cards he was dealt. That this was followed by Code Pink's nonsense during the hearings does not help the anti-war cause either.

--Petraeus proved cool-headed and unflappable through hours of testimony, questions, and grandstanding lectures by members of Congress.

--Petraeus's proposal to withdraw 30,000 troops, bringing forces to pre-surge levels next July, steals some thunder from the Democrats, especially because Petraeus said he would revisit troop levels in March. Democrats may argue that it's too little and too slow, but assuming Petraeus's recommendations are taken up by Bush, removing some troops blunts criticism of Bush as a pig-headed dead-ender who is oblivious to the strain the current troop levels are placing on the military.

--Democratic leaders still seem to have resigned themselves to the fact that they'll lose this round of the battle over the war. Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Nancy Pelosi again made the argument that as long as Bush's signature is needed, they cannot end the war. And that brings me to my final point.

--Democrats don't want to end the war. The biggest issue they have going for them in 2008 is: the only way we can end the war is to elect a Democratic president and more Democrats to Congress. Their base may get restive in the meantime, but the grassroots will still be energized next year by the prospect of retaking the White House.

That's how it looks now anyway. We'll see where things are over the next couple of weeks.

topics:
Nancy Pelosi, Military

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/09/12/petraeus-report-advantage-bush

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT