Amy Zegart has a new book called Spying Blind: The CIA, the
FBI, and the Origins of 9/11. She's guest-blogging over at The
Volokh Conspiracy today, and kicks off with her top 5 most
depressing findings:
1. The FBI failed to find 9/11 hijackers Khalid
al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi 19 days before 9/11 even though they
were hiding in plain sight. On the night of 9/11, an FBI search of
public records found al-Mihdhar's correct San Diego address within
hours. Unbeknownst to the Bureau, both terrorists had lived with an
FBI informant in San Diego, made contact with several targets of
FBI counterterrorism investigations, and used their real names on
everything from credit cards to telephone listings.
2. Just weeks before 9/11, the FBI's own highly classified
counterterrorism review gave failing grades to every single one of
the Bureau's 56 U.S. field offices. (The report was considered so
embarrassing, only a handful of copies were ever made).
3. A January 2002 internal FBI review found that 66% of the
FBI's 1,200 analysts (the people who "connect the dots") were
unqualified to do their jobs.
4. Twenty months before 9/11, the CIA got wind that al Qaeda
operatives might be gathering in Malaysia for a planning meeting --
what one intelligence official described to me as "the al Qaeda
convention." Two of the participants turned out to be 9/11
hijackers. The CIA established surveillance, but lost track of them
as soon as the meeting disbanded. Management was so hosed up that
one CIA official believed, and kept telling his bosses, that the
terrorists were being monitored 5 days after they had disappeared
into the Streets of Bangkok.
5. The CIA and FBI missed a total of 23 opportunities to
potentially disrupt the 9/11 plot.