The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Too Many Lawyers?

Andy McCarthy -- on the short list for Attorney General for any smart future GOP president -- argued earlier today that we have overlawyered the war on terror and abdicated what should be political decisions to the courts. I was mulling it over and thinking that there are good arguments on both sides. Then along comes Arthur Branch Thompson in South Carolina who declares that if we capture Osama Bin Laden we shouldn't just interrogate and execute him we should afford him "due process." I know, I know --Howard Dean said the same thing last election. I am certain a trusted communications fellow or gal will be sent out to "explain" but isn't this part of what McCarthy was decrying? Yes, we want check and balances, we want some legal oversight and I agree that when pushed to its limits executive authority may be lost or circumscribed but do we have to Mirandize OBL? A jury of his peers? The mind reels. Something tells me no other candidate will agree with this one.

topics:
Law, Iran

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Jennifer Rubin

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/09/10/too-many-lawyers
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT