Politico has this report on Mitt Romney's
Iraq's remarks, suggesting that Romney is using language less
measured than previously. According to the report, Romney labels
Iraq a "mess" -- just at the time President Bush is trying to
convince Congress it is a little less of a "mess" than it used to
be -- and focuses on a three step withdrawal process. (For some,
conceding it's a "mess" may seem like refreshing candor and for
others like giving ammunition to Congressional opponents.) On its
face it sounds like what Senators Lugar and Warner have been saying
--focus less on the "winning" part and more on the salvaging what
we can part. On the other hand, Romney is quoted as saying he is
opposed to a precipitous withdrawal. Based on this report it's not
possible to discern whether Romney is deviating from the basic
Republican position that the Surge has bought some time, the
situation is not lost and facts on the ground should determine
troop levels. All that said, I can't imagine John McCain, for
example, speaking in this vein and I suspect we'll hear about it at
the debate.