Jennifer did a nice PARTIAL
summation of Huckabee's weaknessnesses, but to those weaknesses
and the also-discussed nastiness of his going negative so early and
so frequently against the other GOP candidates (that NASTY man!),
she, and everybody who comments on Huck, ought to NOT leave out his
ethical lapses, or at least his serious blindness to ethical lapses
around him --of which there have been many. I keep waiting for the
so-called MSM to give Huck and his ethical baggage at least as much
scrutiny as it has given Giuliani's feud with some firefighters,
for instance, or -- and this is the best comparison -- as it has
given to the dating history of the wife of undeclared presidential
candidate Fred Thompson. The MSM in this country is no longer even
a serious institution. A pack mentality rules. Right now the pack
thinks Huck is fun because he is folksy and somewhat witty, and
because his rhetoric plays into the pack's class-obsessed, liberal
worldview. So he gets no serious scrutiny, even as he DOES get
feted with puff piece after puff piece about "momentum" stemming
from a distant second place finish in a vote-for-hire "straw poll"
that elects no delegates and at which three of the four top
candidates did not participate. Gee, how hard is it to finish
second to the only "top tier" candidate even bothering to contest
the worthless beauty contest, anyway?