Okay, I have now read the Kos piece
attacking Jindal and defending the scurrilous ad run by the LA
Demo Party. I therefore update my earlier
blog to make room for the possibility that Kos isn't so much
hateful as he is just plain stupid or utterly ignorant of what he
tries to write about. His analysis of Jindal's column shows
absolutely no understanding of the subject matter.
I myself am a Protestant, and I disagree with a number of
Jindal's points. I similarly disagree with the same number of the
Catholic Church's points on those topics, because Jindal ACCURATELY
portrayed those points and the church's position on them. I know
this, because I was a theology major at a Jesuit University and
have studied this stuff. Indeed, it is on just some of these points
that my disagreement with the Catholic Church and Jindal keeps me
from becoming a Catholic. BUT NONE OF THAT IS TO SAY THAT ANYTHING
THAT JINDAL WROTE, OR THAT THE CATHOLIC CHURCH PREACHES ON THOSE
POINTS, AMOUNTS IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM TO A SERIOUS INSULT TO
PROTESTANTS. What Jindal wrote is a fairly unremarkable exposition
of Catholic doctrine, and I as a Protestant am not offended by it
even though I disagree with much of it. All that Jindal is doing is
explaining why he believes his is the one true Church; but he does
not insult Protestants in so doing, but quite explicitly, in the
very passages quoted by Kos himself, invites Protestants to
consider his points seriously rather than dismiss them.
To repeat: Jindal offers not an insult, but an invitation. It's
as if a Mason invited a non-Mason to become a Mason, or even as if
a Yankees fan invited a non-Yankees fan to become a Yankees fan:
The invitation may or may not be one that the recipient wants to
accept, but only a truly twisted recipient would consider the
invitation an insult rather than a generous gesture.
The point here, by the way, is not to analyze or discuss the
theology itself at issue, but only to explain the basic thrust of
what Jindal was attempting in that long-ago essay. To actually use
that thoughtful and generous essay as grounds for a political
attack ad, somehow asserting that the essay expressed a vicious
bigotry against Protestants, is to utterly mispresent the essay and
is itself a clear attempt to play into any anti-Catholic bigotry
that may or may not still exist in heavily Protestant North
Louisiana.
It is contemptible, and even if Kos is merely stupid or ignorant
in what he writes (rather than downright hateful), it is
contemptible for Kos or ANYBODY to defend the ad and repeat the
slander against Jindal.