Byron York's new article in National Review(print edition) is a
balanced and interesting read on the strengths and challenges Fred
Thompson faces. He notes two key problems. First, on his Senate
career York notes : "During his years in the Senate from 1994 to
2003, it was well known that he wasn't terribly fond of the work.
He still isn't." York also notes his accomplishmenst are slight,
saying his accomplishments in working on defense and welfare reform
"are big accomplishments, [but] they are group accomplishments, and
Thompson's claim is pretty modest, at least for a presidential
candidate; 50 other Republican senators from that era could say
something similar." Second, York also explains that Thompson needs
to make the case for why he is different and better than his
competitors, saying " it's hard to claim that his positions are
terribly different from those of the other conservatives running
for the Republican presidential nomination." York does find
Thompson is working hard now, slimming down (we don't get chubby
contenders anymore apparently) and is an "impressive man, sly-smart
with varied life experiences." Less than a month from now we'll see
what Thompson adds to the mix and whether, despite his conventional
conservative message, GOP voters find him a more effective
messenger than his rivals.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.