Larry and Philip both completely misunderstand my point. There
should be no confusion if the Fed does it right. Imagine you have
two passengers in a car. One of them wants the driver to get there
faster. The other one is worried about getting a speeding ticket.
The driver tells them both: "Look, I have cruise control, and I
have a CB radio where they tell me if there are any cops out. I am
speeding up from 70 to 73. So I'll be going faster, but the cruise
control will make sure I don't go TOO fast, and I'll slow down
again at the first sign of trouble." That's not confusion, that's
clarity -- the sort of clarity that satisfies both of them. That's
what I am suggesting the Fed should do: Put the foot on the
accelerator just a tiny bit, while announcing that its bias is in
favor of slowing down again at the first sign of trouble. Why
doesn't that make sense?