The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Re: Giuliani's Kids

Phil: So would you say Howard Kurtz is wrong when he writes, apropos Slate's outing of Ms. Giuliani, "[A] n outrageous invasion of privacy by a voracious media? Not this time. These days, posting something on your Facebook profile is the equivalent of standing in Times Square with a banner." If the young woman didn't want to have anything to do with the story, why did she let it be known she's an Obama backer in the first place? Just so her fellow incoming freshmen at Harvard would know and maybe like her for who she isn't? And since when are New York City 17 year olds the equivalents of babes in the woods?

Creepier, actually, is Obama's response, as quoted by Kurtz:

"That's very nice. We think it's wonderful that we are attracting support from young people all across the country. I can't wait to meet her."

It was bad enough when John Edwards interfered in the Cheney family's private matters. Now Obama wants to reward a young woman for her public display of disloyalty to her father.

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Wlady Pleszczynski

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/08/07/re-giulianis-kids
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT