After watching
the video of the incident with the uniformed soldier at
YearlyKos, I have to say that it seems like less of a big deal than
it did when I read about it. The audience isn't really behind Jon
Soltz when he yells at the guy; they just sit there dumbfounded.
And since Soltz warns the soldier (before his question begins) not
to say anything political in uniform, "for or against," the answer
to my
question -- Would the reaction have been different if a
uniformed questioner had been assenting to anti-war orthodoxy
rather than dissenting from it? -- may be that it wouldn't, in
fact, have been much different. When asked later, the questioner
doesn't deny that he's breaking the rules. I don't know for sure
that he is -- I'll leave it to the milbloggers to
hash that
out -- but it's probably unfair to blame anyone else in the
room for Soltz's freak-out.