I recently wrote about the declared
and undeclared GOP candidates' positions on global warming. I
neglected to mention Newt Gingrich. To recap: 1) John McCain and
Rudy Giuliani (and this summer's National Review article
) have said they believe that the weight of evidence supports the
conclusion that global warming is real and results at least in part
from human activity. 2) Mitt Romney has been more circumspect on
his views of the science but in practice has supported steps
similar to those advocated by Giuliani, stating "Rudy Giuliani is
right in terms of an Apollo project to get us energy independent,
and the effects of that on global warming are positive." and 3)
Fred Thompson contends people who believe in global warming are
like the flat earth believers in
Galileo's time.
In his debate with John Kerry earlier in the year Newt said: "My
message, I think, is that the evidence is sufficient that we should
move toward the most effective possible steps to reduce
carbon-loading of the atmosphere." As to proposed solutions, he
advocates ""a new science- and technology-based entrepreneurial,
market-oriented and locally led environmentalism."
Whether because he has concluded that the science is persuasive
or whether he sees the political upside, Newt has clearly thrown
his lot in with those who do not want to cede this issue to the
Democrats. As with healthcare, he and others are betting that the
better tactic is to use the issue as another opportunity to
demonstrate Republicans' commitment to free markets and innovation
and their opposition to the heavy hand of government.