So now we know what caused the Wall Street Journal to
decline to the point that it needed a Rupert Murdoch to bail it
out. Take it from the Washington Post's David Ignatius,
who was a top reporter at the Journal in its heyday, which
peaked around 1985, he writes, the same year, as it happens, that
Ignatius left the paper. But that's not the (only) reason the paper
began to decline. By the 1990s the real cause was apparent. The
culprit was the Journal's "fiery" editorial page. The
change came when, in the '90s, the editorial page "increasingly did
its own reporting, with equal portions of journalistic hustle and
ideological spin, and it often overshadowed the news side. I
suspect that helped undermine the franchise. Advertisers, in the
end, perhaps weren't enthralled with a newspaper distinguished by
vitriolic right-wing attack editorials."
Bob Bartley is long dead, but still the knives are out for him.
An independent two-page section of a thick paper undercut the rest
of it? Ignatius may lack journalistic hustle these days ("I
suspect," "perhaps"), which means he's left with not much more than
ideological spin to define him.