Phil: It's worth comparing the candidates' performance in the
ARG polls among Republicans vs. independents. In New Hampshire,
where Giuliani and Romney are in a statistical dead heat among both Republicans and
independents, it might not matter too much whether the percentage
of independents in ARG's sample is representative. But in Iowa and South Carolina, a little bit of
statistical noise on this front could make a big difference.
In Iowa, the sample of likely republican voters (those who
"definitely plan to participate" in the caucuses) is 82% Republican
and 18% independent. Romney is winning among the Republicans with
24% to Giuliani's 21%; Romney registers only 6% among independents,
who back Giuliani by 25% and McCain(!) by 37%.
In South Carolina, Giuliani leads F. Thompson 29%-25% among
Republicans, but Thompson crushes Giuliani among independents, 43%
to 17%. The South Carolina sample is 90% Republican and 10%
independent.
In short, if ARG is oversampling independents in Iowa, or
undersampling them in South Carolina, Giuliani's leads in those
states are illusory.