The
Washington Post has an interesting look at Thompson's legal
career and opposition to tort reform. I frankly think the larger
issue for him is not his social conservative credentials (his
voting record appears to have satisfied most pro-life advocates)
but his legal conservative ones. In addition to opposition to tort
reform he, of course, championed and until 4 years ago defended
McCain Feingold, an
anathema to conservative activists and First Amendment advocates of
all stripes. He has also supported affirmative
action. It is unclear whether he is sticking with these
positions or will be "evolving," but none strike me as the product
of what we think of a conservative legal disposition. If Thompson
were to explain his views in depth and respond to questions as to
his thinking (and possible changes of heart) it would be just the
type of approach which would demonstrate his preparedness and
confidence for the race.