Marc Ambinder and
Jim Geraghty both report that another staffer, Sam LeBlond,
left the Thompson camp and, according to Ambinder, other departures
are imminent. There seems to be some dispute as to whether LeBlond
had a significant role in the campaign. Let me share what I know.
Late last night I emailed Mark Corallo, Thompson spokesman, to ask
whether there were other departures. He responded multiple times by
email between 9:20 and 11:00 a.m. this morning that there were no
such departures and none in the offing. When I pressed as to
whether there were any paid or unpaid departures he responded
"nope." When Ambinder's story broke I called Corallo to ask why he
had given different information. He called me back a short time
later to say LeBlond was an 'intern" and that Corallo could not
have been expected to know about such a low level person. I said
that the news reports indicated he was an advance staffer, not an
intern. Again Corallo said he would check and called be back, this
time saying LeBlond was indeed an advance staffer but not someone
in any position of authority.
So is this all a tempest in a teapot? Was I misled or
did the campaign spokesman just not have all the facts? I would
like to believe it is the latter. It does however sound eerily like
the pro-choice lobby snafu. (Was Thompson denying the lobbying or
did he just have no recollection? Was Thompson denying any White
House lobbying or just lobbying Sununu?) We pesky reporters expect
that especially in Presidential campaigns we will get honest "yes"
and honest "no" and candid "don't know" answers and hopefully not
have to play 20 questions with campaign spokesmen to get an answer
we can take to the bank. This, by the way, has been my experience
with each of the other three Republican campaigns I cover. It is
imperative for campaigns to maintain both the appearance and
reality of candor and competence. Otherwise, on really big stuff
there will be no reservoir of trust or credibility. Something to
think about.