The news reported the other day that the D.C. government
will appeal the ruling in Parker v. the District of
Columbia. Here is Adrian Fenty's "logic" for the appeal:
"We have made the determination that this law can and
should be defended and we are willing to take our case to the
highest court in the land to protect the city's residents," Fenty
said in a press release. "Our handgun law has saved countless lives
-- keeping guns out of the hands of those who would hurt others or
themselves."
I wonder if Fenty said that with a straight face. If the hand
gun ban has saved "countless" lives, why does D.C. has one of the
highest murder rates in the nation (and often the
highest)?
If you follow Fenty's logic to its conclusion, then D.C.
residents are, on average, quite a bit more violent than elsewhere
in the nation, and would have acted on their violent urges if they
had access to guns.
The logic behind gun control has been obviously faulty for quite
some time.
topics:
Law