The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Phil: This is not intended in any way to appear as an effort on my part to get invited back on the wacky Savage show, but I don't understand your point about C-Span's not being taxpayer-funded. You write: "Lamb explained that the channel is not publicly funded, but financed via a five cent contribution from everybody's cable bill." Our various utility bills are filled with such de-facto taxes. Remember the outrage when Al Gore sought ways to fund his Internet in every classroom scheme through I believe it additional charges on phone bills? If the five-cent "contribution" is not voluntary, it's a tax, legislatively mandated. It's all for a great cause, agreed, but it's nonetheless something that could have been concocted by a Ralph Nader -- or were you spared compulsory contributions to Naderite "pergs" while paying student fees during your college days?

topics:
Taxes

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Wlady Pleszczynski

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/06/22/re-defending-lamb-from-savage
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT