An underlying theme of the review, if not the book itself, is
that there is an inherent contradiction between being black and
conservative:
Thus, although he seriously believes that his
extremely conservative legal opinions are in the best interests of
African-Americans, and yearns to be respected by them, he is
arguably one of the most viscerally despised people in black
America. It is incontestable that he has benefited from affirmative
action at critical moments in his life, yet he denounces the policy
and has persuaded himself that it played little part in his
success. He berates disadvantaged people who view themselves as
victims of racism and preaches an austere individualism, yet
harbors self-pitying feelings of resentment and anger at his own
experiences of racism. His ardent defense of states' rights would
have required him to uphold Virginia's anti-miscegenation law, not
to mention segregated education, yet he lives with a white wife in
Virginia. He is said to dislike light-skinned blacks, yet he is the
legal guardian of a biracial child, the son of one of his numerous
poor relatives....
Thomas says that growing up, he was teased
mercilessly because his hair, complexion and features were too
"Negroid" and that his schoolyard nickname was "ABC: America's
Blackest Child." The authors seem inclined to believe
contemporaries of Thomas who claim that he exaggerates and has
confused class prejudice with color prejudice, as if class
prejudice were any less execrable. On this, I'm inclined to believe
Thomas, although, given where he now sits, the wife he sleeps with,
the child he has custody of and the company he keeps, it might be
time to get over it.
Then we get this bit about the confirmation hearings:
Of greater import would have been a critical
examination of the bruising politics behind these hearings, the way
both sides manipulated Thomas and Anita Hill, and the questionable ethics and strategic blunder
of the left in focusing on Thomas's sexuality, given America's
malignant racial history on this subject, instead of on his suspect
qualifications for the job.
Under normal circumstances, a black man who came from a poor,
isolated, part of Georgia, overcame racial prejudice and worked his
way up to become a Supreme Court justice would be a hero of the
left. However, instead of his life experiences turning him toward
liberalism, Thomas turned toward religion, individualism, and a
belief in personal responsibility. So to the left, he is an
unqualified moron who only got where he is because of affirmative
action.