George Will compares Fred Thompson's rise to
the Tulip craze in Holland, the quintessential boom market followed
by a crash. In the process Will makes the following point:
In their haste to anoint Thompson as another
Reagan, the anointers are on the verge of endorsing what Reagan's
disdainers have long argued-that Reagan was 99 percent charm and 1
percent substance.
The Thompson boom has so far been based much more on style than
substance, whereas anybody who understands Reagan (see his
diaries), knows there was much more to him than an actor who played
the role of a president. He also governed the largest state in the
country before becoming president. As I have argued before,
Thompson supporters have made the case for him on the basis of his
style and a belief that he is a "true conservative" who can fill
the vacuum in the current field. Now that he's by all indication a
serious candidate, it's time to make a much more substantive case
for Fred.
UPDATE: Ramesh Ponnuru thinks that Will "largely misses
the target."