A commenter to my postbelow on F. Thompson writes:
The new Lamar
Alexander...whoopee...get Fred a lumberjackshirt and roll up the
sleeves....
The Lamar comparison is something that has ocurred to me recently,
and not just because both men are from Tennessee, but because like
Alexander before him, Thompson is running as a regular guy who
shares everybody's frustration with Washington. Granted, Thompson
has a lot more charisma than Alexander, but I think there's a
comparison to be made in terms of their populist messages.
UPDATE: Another one chimes in:
Fred Thompson
did exactly what he should have done at this juncture, and that was
to effectively articulate his unique grasp of, and perspective on
the problems and issues that are of greatest concern to voters.
Please tell us you didn't really think he was going to use the
venue of an often-times tabloidish TV talk/argument show to lay out
his entire policy agenda. And this without even being a
full-fledged candidate?? To use the contemporary vernacular, "GET
REAL!"
Fair enough. But the point is, now that he has moved from the realm
of a fantasy candidate to a likely candidate who is "testing the
waters" he has to begin to offer more. And those who have been
building him up as the savior of the party should begin making a
much more substantive case for his candidacy than they have been up
until now. It's okay to have a wait and see attitude, but there are
people out there declaring him the winner of last night's debate,
and I don't know what they were watching. I sat through two hours
of candidates wrestling with challenging questions, giving detailed
answers, and offering solutions. Then I watched Thompson ruminate
on our challenges in a softball interview with Sean Hannity. And
don't get me wrong, I actually like Thompson and agreed with much
of what he had to say. But when you're running for the most
powerful job in the world, you need to bring more to the table.
Obviously, it's still early, and I look forward to seeing more from
him.