I also tuned in to watch Fred Thompson being interviewed by Sean
Hannity. The news portion of the interview was that Thompson
announced his new website, I'mWithFred.
After watching two hours of Republicans answer tough questions,
I thought Thompson's performance was a dud. If I didn't know going
in that he was considered a top tier presidential candidate, I
would have thought of him as just another talking head. He was fine
at laying out a lot of the problems and challenges we face that he
said people aren't really talking about correctly or don't
comprehend (Iran, the War on Terror, globalization, entitlements,
etc.) but he didn't offer any solutions to those problems or make
any sort of case for why he thinks he might be the person best
suited to solve them. Say what you want about Romney, McCain, and
Giuliani, but they point to specific accomplishments of theirs to
make the argument that they are the most qualified to lead the
nation at this time. When Rudy Giuliani complains about government
not working, he can credibly say, as he did in tonight's debate, "I
turned around New York City, I can turn around Washington." For all
of the hoopla surrounding Thompson, neither he nor any of his fans
have made the case for what he has tangibly done that recommends him for the highest office in the
land. Obviously, it's early, and he hasn't even announced he's
running yet. But now that it seems apparent that he intends to run,
it's showtime--and he has to offer more than just more folksy
outsider schtick.
topics:
Entitlements, Iran