The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Richardson: You're right, James, he's awful. I don't think he's directly answered a question yet (at least not without a cross-examination by Blitzer).

Gravel: He's nuts, of course, but (unlike Kucinich), he's also interesting. It's refreshing to not know exactly what's going to come out of his mouth.

Edwards: He lurches to the left at every opportunity -- attacking Hillary on the war and Obama on health care. There's a certain pathetic desperation to this. Remember when Edwards was the Southern moderate?

Clinton and Obama are both doing pretty well. I wouldn't say anyone is winning.

topics:
Health Care

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by John Tabin

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/06/03/halftime-notes-on-the-debate

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT