Paul Wolfowitz - hardly a blame-America-firster -
defended the removal of Saddam Hussein explicitly on the grounds
that it would assuage one of bin Laden's grievances. In an
interview with Vanity Fair the former Assistant Defense
Secretary said that U.S. forces stationed in Saudi Arabia had "been
a source of enormous difficulty for a friendly government. It's
been a huge recruiting device for al Qaeda. In fact if you look at
bin Laden, one of his principle grievances was the presence of
so-called crusader forces on the holy land, Mecca and Medina."
Wolfowitz was correct, of course...