The Republican Study Committee highlights Democrats' plan to request an
assessment of the geopolitical effects of climate change from the
Director of National Intelligence. Gregg Easterbrook had an
interesting article in the April Atlantic Monthly on
the consequences of climate change (the mixed-bag picture he paints
strikes me as cutting against his conclusion that preserving the
status quo is worth the regulatory burden, by the way). As
Easterbrook acknowledges, though, this is all quite speculative;
the science is just too inexact to make firm predictions. Producing
intel analysis based on such guesswork seems like a huge waste of
resources.