The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

The Republican Study Committee highlights Democrats' plan to request an assessment of the geopolitical effects of climate change from the Director of National Intelligence. Gregg Easterbrook had an interesting article in the April Atlantic Monthly on the consequences of climate change (the mixed-bag picture he paints strikes me as cutting against his conclusion that preserving the status quo is worth the regulatory burden, by the way). As Easterbrook acknowledges, though, this is all quite speculative; the science is just too inexact to make firm predictions. Producing intel analysis based on such guesswork seems like a huge waste of resources.

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by John Tabin

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/05/08/climatology-as-intelligence

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT