The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Oh, I don't agree with Paul's answer. I'm just saying it probably won't matter that much to the average voter, who only vaguely followed the Plame/Libby matter. My guess is it wasn't even a seriously considered response -- it was just a symbolic answer to show solidarity with a certain kind of antiwar voter and an opportunity for Paul to inject his Iraq views into the debate. Now, there are probably even fewer of those kinds of voters in the Republican primaries than there are people who care deeply about whether Libby gets pardoned, but that's why Paul's is largely a symbolic candidacy.

topics:
Iraq

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

biniki| 9.2.09 @ 10:02PM

bikini
bikini swimwear

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/05/04/re-quick-react-on-debate-1
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

ADVERTISEMENT