The Spectacle Blog
Even my eight-year-old brother is YouTube proficient. So why not the Supreme Court?
Okay, so the Court didn't exactly post its smoking evidence on YouTube. But the opinion in Scott v. Harris turns on video evidence, which the Court has posted on its site. Scalia and Breyer both seem to invite wide viewing of the video. SCOTUSBlog is quite impressed.
View all comments (2) | Leave a comment
Leave a Comment
Related Blog Posts
More Blog Posts by David Holman
http://spectator.org/blog/2007/04/30/the-youtube-scotus
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
Special Feature
Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:
FLASHBACK TO: 1984
-
The Fairness Delusion
The speech our President should make.
-
Media Smears: One Man’s Experiences
A noted economist fires back.
-
Chuck Colson vs. The Fundamentalists
How political can you get?
-
The Reagan Doctrine
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
-
The Woman Problem
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
Clip of the Day
ADVERTISEMENT
pigment Red| 4.2.10 @ 12:58AM
pigment Red
czmaxpct@gmail.com
Ink Pigments
Organic Pigments
pigment Red| 4.2.10 @ 1:02AM
pigment Red
czmaxpct@gmail.com
Ink Pigments
Organic Pigments