The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

RE: What Gamble?

Because a large part of McCain's appeal is with independent voters, something the war has already eroded. McCain's best performances in 2000 -- indeed, almost all his wins -- came in open primaries. Other than Arizona, he lost actual Republicans in every state. That even includes liberal states like Massachusetts, where he won over 60 percent because of huge margins among independents.

Now, McCain ended up losing the nomination for the very same reason -- Bush cleaned his clock when the schedule shifted to closed primiaries. So perhaps McCain's war stance will help him attract more Republican base support. But it is definitely a gamble, because it is based on trying to win over McCain skeptics at the expense of possibly alienating his strongest supporters.

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2007/04/13/re-what-gamble
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT