I haven't blogged on the Imus affair, because I just didn't
think it was that big a deal, but now that it has become front page
news in the New York Times and Washington Post,
and it has become a political issue, with Obama calling for Imus's scalp and Hillary asking her
fans to send a message of support via her website, I
feel compelled to comment. And the main question I have is: why is
this such a big deal?
I guess part of the reason why I don't find it that noteworthy
is that growing up in the NY area, I always thought of Imus as a
competitor to Howard Stern, and I was never a big fan of the whole
shock jock phenomenon. Also, I never found him funny, and I
remember that his show used these sound effects such as quacking
ducks and BOING! noises at random points, and that was like nails
on the blackboard to me in the morning. The fact that he tries to
present himself as more sophisticated than Stern, and attracts
major political figures as guests, I suppose, explains why it's
more of a general news story than if another shock jock had made an
offensive comment. But I still don't quite get why, with everything
going on in the world, this is the top story of the week. What Imus
said may have been innapropriate, but given the amount of news
coverage it has generated, you'd think he advocated raping women,
said Martin Luther King Jr. got what was coming to him, or praised
Adolf Hitler.