A hat tip to NRO's Media Blog for highlighting
this example of outrageous media bias. ABC, in a news story, is
calling the Swift Boat ads a "smear" and, worse, "slanderous." That
last word might be legally actionable. The simple question should
arise though: What, pray tell, is slanderous about telling the
truth? And how is it a smear? The fact remains that John Kerry
claims to have, in effect, lied to his own diary. The Swift Boat
vets were doing their patriotic duty in pointing that out. Kerry
was not in Cambodia at Christmas that year. And some of his other
accounts of his wartime experiences, including some of his claims
of heroism, just don't hold up to scrutiny.
Now it is true that critics of the Swifties say the Swiftie ads
were smears and slanders. Fine. If ABC wants to cite CRITICS saying
so, that might be fair journalism. But for ABC of its own volition
to use the words "smear" and "slanderous" is an outrage and an
absolute violation of journalistic ethics -- except that these
days, "journalistic ethics" has become an oxymoron, at least when
applied to ABC, CBS, NBC, the New York Times, and the LA Times.
And if that last sentence of mine is slanderous, I invite those
supposed "news" organizations to make the most of it.