Iranian president Ahmadinejad did just announce that the Brits will be released today. As some of us predicted, the quid pro quo included concessions by the United States-we know that Iranian officials will now be allowed to visit the five Iranian "diplomats" detained by the United States in Iraq for supporting the insurgency.I think Loyola's hunch is probably right; as I wrote in my column today, I suspect the nuclear issue was at least as important a part of this gambit by the Revolutionary Guards as the detained Iranians in Iraq.What we haven't seen yet-but it probably won't be long-are the details of the promises Iran extracted concerning its territorial integrity. Iran knows that as it races towards nuclear breakout, it is getting very close to a military confrontation with the United States. Getting the British to agree to back down from the nuclear standoff-and getting them to promise not to allow the U.S. to use the airbase at Diego Garcia-would be an enormous victory for the Mullahs. And it shouldn't be long before they start bragging about it.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.