A Democratic friend who is inexplicably interested in Huckabee’s
campaign (professionally, not personally, interested) noted his
fundraising take for the first quarter:
$500,000.
Wow.
CBS
notes:
But Huckabee’s take in the first three months of
2007 was pretty meager: $500,000. In fact, his total was so low
that it caused a spike in speculation that Huckabee will eventually
abandon his presidential bid to challenge Democratic Sen.
Mark Pryor in 2008. Yet even in a Senate race,
Huckabee’s fundraising wouldn’t be considered
overwhelming.
Indeed. Will some conservatives stop taking him seriously now?
Readers of Jeremy Lott’s
review of Huckabee’s book will have little doubt:
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee has formed an
exploratory committee to consider running for president. Careful
readers of his latest book, “From Hope to Higher Ground: 12 STOPs
to Restoring America’s Greatness,” will wonder if that’s really the
office he wants to win.
…
Steps readers can take to STOP being cynical include “Watch classic
films made before 1968,” “Practice… ‘Random Acts of Kindness’ ”
and “Watch TV Land and Nick at Nite more; network TV less” (Nick at
Nite’s current schedule includes such classics as “Designing
Women,” “Murphy Brown” and “Rosanne”).
…
His policy proposals on most issues are a mix of conservative
rhetoric and liberal hand-wringing. On education, he proposes
testing and administrative reforms, promotes charter schools and
insists that states should fully fund arts and music programs.
School choice is conspicuous by its absence.
…
On the environment he writes, “Al Gore wasn’t entirely wrong when
he spoke of ‘earth in the balance.’ Balance is exactly what we
need.”
Mr. Huckabee’s approach to health care is to declare war on ill
health, which he takes to be caused by fat, sugar, salt and sloth.
As with seatbelts, drunk driving and cigarettes, he advocates that
the government and civic society should first work to change
attitudes toward these things and then “having shifted public
opinion, we can solidify the attitude and atmospheric changes with
government actions to statutorily define the will of the
majority.”