In my Thursday column,
I reference an exchange I had with Mitt Romney at CPAC last Friday
on his position on guns. In the interest of transparency, I have
transcribed our full exchange.
PK: On gun control, I know you signed an
assault weapons ban in Massachusetts in 2004, now I know you joined
the NRA within the last year. Can you tell me if an assault weapons
ban came up at the federal level, would you sign or veto that?
ROMNEY: Well, it depends on what it
looked like, but…
PK: If it was something like the ‘94
bill…
ROMNEY: I have indicated that my
position is the same as it has been which is I support the Second
Amendment, but I also support (an) assault weapon ban, that’s why I
signed a bill of that nature. That’s what I said back in ‘94. I’m
in the same position that President Bush is. President Bush also
says he supports the Second Amendment, but he would support an
assault weapon ban. But the specifics of the particular ban are
something that I’d have to look at, and it’s been a long time since
we’ve looked at the particular types of weapons that might be
involved. So my position is the same there as it has been before
—
PK: But if the ‘94 one came up for vote
again…
ROMNEY: Well obviously, we’ve learned some
things since then. I haven’t seen the specific proposal at this
stage and so I couldn’t comment on it until we had. We had an
effort in Massachusetts on the part of some to ban 50 caliber
rifles. I opposed that, indicated I would oppose that ban. You
know, I think we have to be very careful in any way restricting
Second Amendment rights. I support the Second Amendment. We’ve got
a gun at our house, it’s owned by my son. I’ve hunted since I was a
young man. I believe that people have the right to bear arms. But I
also recognize that there’s some types of weapons that don’t need
to be in the public’s hands, machine guns certainly, and I’d be
open to consider appropriate kind of measures, but I’m not looking
for blanket kind of prohibitions on people being able to have arms
for their defense.