Mitt Romney just stopped by Bloggers' Corner here at CPAC, and I
asked him whether, given that he signed an assault weapon's ban in
Massachusetts in 2004 but has since become a lifelong member of the
NRA, he would sign or veto a federal ban on assault weapons if it
were presented to him. He basically punted on the issue, saying he
couldn't comment if he didn't know the specifics of the
legislation. To be fair, this is more or less the same way that
Giuliani domestic advisor Bill Simon answered
when I posed a similar question yesterday.
Romney said, "My position is the same as it has been, which is
that I support the Second Ammendment, but I also support assault
weapon's ban, that's why I signed a bill of that nature…" I
followed up and asked what he would feel about a federal ban, and
he said, "the specifics of the particular ban are something that
I'd have to look at, and it's been a long time since we've looked
at the types of weapons that would be involved."
Ed over at
Captain's Quarters has a podcast up, with the full audio of
Romney's answer, as well as his answers to other questions. Karol
over at Alarming
News also has a write up.