Whenever you hear the terms "reasonable," "fair," and "decency"
regarding government regulation, you can be pretty sure that said
regulation will be anything but. It's all right there in the
Washington Post's endorsement of the silly "Airline Passengers' Bill
of Rights":
Meanwhile, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) introduced a
passengers' bill of rights on Saturday and Rep. Mike Thompson
(D-Calif.) plans to do the same next week. Both bills require
airlines to allow travelers to get off planes after three hours of
delay. That's more reasonable than what JetBlue is offering. And
Mr. Thompson's bill goes a step further to mandate frequent updates
on the cause and timing of delays.
Kate Hanni, who founded the Coalition for an Airline Passengers'
Bill of Rights after being trapped in Austin on an American
Airlines jet with no food, water or access to a bathroom for eight
hours in December, wants a mandated 150 percent refund for
passengers who are bumped or whose flights are canceled or
postponed. The congressional bills wisely avoid saddling the very
competitive and not-very-profitable airline industry with
potentially crippling penalties. Neither should the government be
micromanaging airline customer service. But setting minimal
standards of decency seems like a fair approach.
I particularly like this line: " The congressional bills wisely
avoid saddling the very competitive and not-very-profitable airline
industry with potentially crippling penalties." SURE THEY DO!
HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!!! And even if this legislation is relatively
mild, you can be sure that the social engineers like Boxer will be
back to engage in more micromanaging later on.
I also wonder what's going to happen to safety if the government
mandates a 150 percent refund for folks on flights that are
cancelled or bumped. Won't that put more pressure on airlines to
get their planes off the ground in far from ideal circumstances?
You can't take advantage of a 150 percent refund if your plane has
crashed and you are 100 percent dead.