Less than a day after filing papers to launch his exploratory committee, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's supporters appear to be getting him in hot water.
"Exhibit A" is a letter and packet of materials we received over the Christmas holiday from one Mark Chapin Johnson, a Southern California Republican and supporter of Romney.
Dated December 22, 2006, the Johnson packet included a DVD of an hour-long CSPAN interview with Romney.
“I don’t know what Mitt may choose to do in the future,” Johnson writes rather disingenuously. “Speculation is rife and rampant, but I do know that he is an exceptional man with tremendous integrity and remarkable critical thinking skills.”
Apparently, those thinking skills don’t go so far as to ensure that when one’s supporters mail out thousands of DVDs, you have permission to do so from the original source.
It doesn’t appear from any the materials that reproduction of the interview was every cleared with CSPAN.
According to CSPAN sources, attorneys for the cable operation are looking into the matter.
Just as interesting as how the DVD was produced is the source of the DVD.
Johnson is the CEO of a large, family-owned medical equipment company based in
In fact, given that Romney has so clearly flip-flopped on abortion and other life issues over the years, it’s surprising that he would associate himself so closely with a supporter well known in
Back in 2001, when Cox was mulling retirement, Johnson's name was in play as possible candidate, and he was consistently identified as a "moderate."
“This is just one more thing Romney has to explain to conservatives, and it’s just one more question Reagan Republicans needs to be asking Romney when they get the chance,” says a conservative
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online