The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Wash Times on Rudy

Little by little, the conventional wisdom that Rudy Giuliani is unelectable is starting to fade. In just the past few days, Jonah Goldberg, Michael Barone, and Tom Bevan have written about how Rudy could win the nomination. Today, the Washington Times reports:

Social conservatives -- contrary to conventional wisdom -- will seriously consider supporting the Republican presidential aspirations of Rudolph W. Giuliani even though he's a pro-choice, anti-gun New Yorker, political analysts and operatives say.
But Rudy will never win in South Carolina, say you? The story continues:
Scott Malyerck, executive director of the Republican Party in South Carolina, an early primary test, said voters recognize Mr. Giuliani as a strong, decisive leader and a decision maker.

"John McCain and Mitt Romney have been working hard in South Carolina over the past year," Mr. Malyerck said. "Even though Rudy Giuliani has not formally gotten his campaign up and going, he has been treated like a rock star across the state at rallies and fundraisers alike."

Meanwhile, Richard Viguerie, who not surprisingly is bearish on a Rudy candidacy, calls Giuliani a "blank slate" on taxes and the size of government. Say what you will about Giuliani's record on social issues, but on the tax and size of government issue, he's no blank slate--he cut or eliminated 43 taxes in the liberal New York City, slashed government payrolls and reduced welfare rolls to 1966 levels. The fact that Viguerie would make such a comment reinforces a belief I've had for awhile. The conventional wisdom is that once conservatives learn more about Rudy's record, he'll lose support. However, I think the exact opposite is true. Because of a lot of Republicans who are liberal on social issues tend to be more moderate to liberal on economic issues, conservatives who hear Rudy is pro-choice and pro-gay rights just assume he's also for big government and for raising taxes. Once conservatives are more familiar with Rudy's record in its entirety, they'll be much more able to accept disagreements on social issues, especially if he commits to appointing strict constructionalist judges.

topics:
Taxes, John McCain

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2006/12/22/wash-times-on-rudy

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

Tom Coburn on the Debt 'Disease'

Vivien Chang | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

ADVERTISEMENT