George Will
writes that "There are expected to be 100 million bloggers
worldwide by the middle of 2007, which is why none will be like
Franklin or Paine." Will's piece comes on the heels of a Joseph
Rago column in
yesterday's WSJ along similar lines.
I think that analysis of the blogosphere is often weighted to
the extremes: those on one end who think it will rule the world,
and those who believe it's useless, even detrimental to political
dialogue. The truth, as is often the case, is somewhere in between.
Blogs will never do away with the need for traditional writing and
reporting, because they're responsible for feeding blog content,
and a brilliant essay will always have more staying power than a
blog post. The ease of posting something on a blog is a big reason
why most of them are dreck, but the freewheeling nature of
blogs also allows people to engage in lively debates and throw out
interesting ideas that may not justify a formal column. Blogging
isn't a substitute for the traditional media, but when it's
intelligent, it's a useful supplement to traditional media.