The Spectacle Blog
In the middle of a perfectly reasonable post on why Hillary Clinton for President is a bad idea, Andrew Sullivan drops this odd throwaway line:
I think she'd make a great Supreme Court Justice...What can he mean by that? I can't imagine how that can make sense, from Andrew Sullivan's perspective or almost anyone else's. Is he praising her temperment, intellect, legal expertise, ideology, or something else that would make a good SCOTUS candidate that I haven't thought of?
Or am I taking Andrew too seriously again?
View all comments (1) | Leave a comment
Leave a Comment
Related Blog Posts
More Blog Posts by John Tabin
http://spectator.org/blog/2006/11/30/a-great-what-1
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
Current Issue
- Capital Bound
- Laughing on the Wrong Side
- I Take the Secret Service Scandal Personally
SPONSORED LINKS
Special Feature
Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:
FLASHBACK TO: 1984
-
The Fairness Delusion
The speech our President should make.
-
Media Smears: One Man’s Experiences
A noted economist fires back.
-
Chuck Colson vs. The Fundamentalists
How political can you get?
-
The Reagan Doctrine
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
-
The Woman Problem
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
Clip of the Day
ADVERTISEMENT
biniki| 8.30.09 @ 9:39PM
bikini
bikini swimwear