David, your criticisms are fair enough. I wrote my post more as
a way to start a discussion rather than as a final judgement, and
as I have more time to process data and hear the different
arguments I may alter my view. From the outset, I just really
wanted to view the data as objectively as possible. In our world,
all the talk has been about conservative turnout, so I wanted to
take a step back and make sure I wasn't missing the forest by
focusing on a few trees. As someone who has written extensively on
the impact of the dispirited base and who wants to see the
Republican Party return to its small government roots, I have an
interest in being able to prove that weak conservative turnout did
the party in, but I also want to try and be fair--perhaps in my
desire to be fair I went overboard in the opposite direction. My
initial reaction though is that given the closeness of the Virginia
race, a dropoff in conservative turnout may have cost Republicans
the Senate, and possible some House seats, but the Democrats would
probably have won the House comfortably anyway. So, weaker
conservative turnout may have been one story in this election, but
probably not the story of the election. But
again, I'd love to hear opposing arguments.