March 25, 2011 | 38 comments
March 17, 2011 | 85 comments
March 17, 2011 | 9 comments
March 16, 2011 | 8 comments
March 15, 2011 | 8 comments
John, you make a good point regarding the “gridlock vote.”
As for the treatment that Boaz and Kirby give to national security, they say that libertarians may move away from the Republican Party “If terrorism is not as critical a decision point in upcoming elections, or if support for Bush’s handling of terrorism declines.” However, it should be pretty clear that terrorism will be the dominant issue for the foreseeable future, and even if support for Bush declines, libertarian hawks will still gravitate toward the candidate who would be the best on national security, so the economic/social libertarian swing voter won’t really be “in play” anyway. Or, more accurately, less votes will be “in play” than Boaz and Kirby suggest.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?