The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Whoa, gents. What did you want Hastert to do? Turn the whole thing over to Barney Frank? Apologize, with quivering lip, as Lil’ Billy would’ve? He did what he had to do: take responsibility, order up a slew of investigations, and not commit ritual seppuku to please ABC news. I have no real desire to see Hastert continue as speaker, except if the choice is him or Pelosi.

If we’re going to throw Hastert to the media sharks, we’re nuts. If we do that, he’ll be followed by every other Republican leader. On the other hand, we should rid ourselves of him for the right reasons.

I’ve sat there listening to Hastert explain why earmarks and pork-barrelling are the way Congress shows its constituents it’s working for them. I’m sick of him and all who sail with him. By all means, let’s get someone in that job who can actually cut government spending. But let’s not throw our lot in with the 527 Media who want to blow this whole election.

The Republicans don’t deserve to win. But we don’t deserve what will happen if they lose.

topics:
Earmarks

View all comments (4) |

pigment Red | 4.1.10 @ 10:03PM

Ink Pigments
Organic Pigments

pigment Red | 4.1.10 @ 10:08PM

pigment Red
czmaxpct@gmail.com

Ink Pigments
Organic Pigments

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Jed Babbin

http://spectator.org/blog/2006/10/05/re-hastert-obnoxious-or-not

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

ADVERTISEMENT