The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Down on Allen

Philip, I am not sure many folks argued pre-macaca that Sen. Allen was an A-level candidate. For reasons unique to each presidential hopeful, all the Republicans with their "hats in the ring" strike me as B-level candidates. All have serious liabilities. If you believe that, choosing a "favorite" is a half-hearted selection.

Can he win? Probably not. This Senate race is enough of a challenge right now, and the events of the last couple months are too much of a stain to turn into a road show.

Should he win? Probably not. He doesn't have the stuff to get this far without an impeccable reputation, and doesn't show any signs of improvement.

As disturbing as this race stuff is, though, since the allegations have an element of doubt about them, Allen's gutter strategy disturbs me even more. Charging Webb with being a sexist because he opposed women in combat is cheap. And now, as John Miller mentioned at the Corner yesterday, he attacks Webb for defending the Navy during Tailhook:

I'm in no mood to dump on George Allen today, but I just opened my mailbox here in Virginia and pulled out a piece of mail from the NRSC (and authorized by the Allen campaign) called "Remember Tailhook." It features black-and-white images of young women who look like rape victims, and inside is a quasi-feminist attack on Jim Webb for having the guts to stand up for the Navy during one of its darkest political hours. The mailer also includes quotes from Webb's now-famous 1979 article, in which he insists that women aren't cut out for combat leadership. "Don't forget," says the NRSC, "If James Webb had his way, we'd send women back to a time when they weren't respected, weren't equal, and weren't treated fairly."
Lame. And cheap. As is the fact that Allen is engaging in tit for tat in pointing Post reporters to people who will say Webb used the "n-word."

Is this the modern GOP campaign (Rovian?) strategy? Divide the opposition instead of rallying around core principles?

Jerry Kilgore tried it last year with his death penalty ad, and it didn't work. Allen's campaign seems determined not to learn those lessons.

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by David Holman

http://spectator.org/blog/2006/09/28/down-on-allen

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

Tom Coburn on the Debt 'Disease'

Vivien Chang | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

In a Class of His Own

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT