Phil: The line you quote from Ramesh's op-ed bothered me a bit.
The implication that the 1992 loss lead directly to the Contract
With America approach to the '94 campaign is unfaithful to the
actual history of how the Contract came about. Newt Gingrich and
Dick Armey were lobbying for something like the '94 campaign from
the mid-80s on, carefully shaping and reshaping an agenda that was
both economically conservative at its core and made up of planks
that were popular enough that most Republican candidates were
willing to sign onto it. Maybe the Republican Study Committee has a
similar ongoing effort underway, but unless Mike Pence and his
allies are positioned to capture the leadership in the wake of a
loss it's hard to see how we can count on such an agenda going
anywhere.