Jonah Goldberg has an
column out today accusing liberals of a double standard for
arguing for a flexible, living constitution that evolves with the
times while supporting a narrow reading when it comes to the War on
Terror.
While I can understand the temptation to make such an argument, it
can also be turned around. Liberals can argue that conservatives
are always fussing about appointing judges that strictly interpret
the constitution, while during the War on Terror they have been
willing to allow for a broader definition of the document when it
comes to executive power during wartime.