The Hollywood Reporter article splashed on the Drudge Report right now contains a factual error: It’s not true that “[e]ver since artist Joe Shuster and writer Jerry Siegel created the granddaddy of all comic book icons in 1932, Superman has fought valiantly to preserve ‘truth, justice and the American way.’”
In fact, as Erik Lundegaard explains in a NYT op-ed today, Superman originally stood simply for “truth and justice.” In the radio show that ran from 1940 to 1951, it became “truth, justice, and the American way” in 1942, then went back to simply “truth and justice” by 1944. In a 1948 screen serial, it was “truth, tolerance, and justice.” On the 50s TV show, it was “truth, justice, and the American way” again. On the 1966 Saturday morning cartoon, it was “truth, justice, and freedom.”
After reading Lundegaard’s op-ed, I thought maybe the Superman Returns line— “Does he still stand for truth, justice— all that stuff?” was an in-joke about this history. Nope: The HR report makes clear that all the screenwriters had in mind was the international audience. Just be glad they didn’t take a cue from the comic book writers who’ve infused the Man of Steel with lefty politics in recent years and go with something like “truth, justice, and the United Nations.”
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
trweui | 10.22.09 @ 8:48AM
The first bestsellers book thing that struck me about this book was its size – which I know sounds ridiculous, but if someone is going to defend markets against an international barrage of left-wing soundbites and regulation then I must admit that I was expecting something more substantial. Sadly, this theme of being a little diminutive continues throughout the book.