Rep. Alan Mollohan has temporarily left the House Ethics Panel, hoping to help Democratic leaders stem damage to their “Republicans are corrupt” message.
-I doubt Mollohan’s departure is “temporary.” If anything about his earmarks scandal sticks, he won’t be back.
-Democrats are foolhardy to think that this move cleans up their act sufficiently to go after Republicans. Pelosi is painting Mollohan’s scandal as a partisan attack to provide cover for GOP scandals. But the record so far is clear: Republicans aren’t protecting their politicians from corruption charges (readers of this blog differ on whether that’s a proper response — I think they should presume innocence until guilt is proven, but not undertake a Clintonian scorched Earth policy to protect guys who could very well be guilty as sin). Duke Cunningham’s out of the House and convicted. Tom DeLay is out of leadership and on his way out of the House. Frankly, the dirty Republicans are behaving like Democrats did when they ran the show. As such…
-If Democrats really want to go down this road, a brief white paper listing Democratic scandals from just 1980 to 2000 would make a helpful point. We could begin with Clinton’s lax control of military technology and China’s subsequent leap ahead in military strength and technology. That’s not petty stuff — it helped transform China into the grave threat it is today.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?